Vladyslav Manafov vs Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L L L L
Form
W L W W W W L W L LHead-2-Head: Manafov 2 - 0 Azorin
They have played 5 sets in total, with Manafov winning 4 and Azorin winning 1. The last match between Manafov and Azorin was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 08-10-2020, Second, Hard with Vladyslav Manafov getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vladyslav Manafov | 2 |
| Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin | 0 |
M15 Sharm El Sheikh(08-10-2020)
| Manafov | Stats | Azorin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 825 | Ranking | 834 |
| 327 | Highest Rank | 442 |
| 32 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 5 |
| 60% (340-231) | Career Total W/L | 56% (335-268) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Vladyslav Manafov
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-4 |
Stats
Vladyslav Manafov
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 17 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:44:0 | Average Match Time | 1:44:0 |
| 60% (78/131) | 1st Serve % | 66% (95/145) |
| 79% (62/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (56/95) |
| 53% (28/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (27/50) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 43% (62/145) | Return Points Win % | 31% (41/131) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vladyslav Manafov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luigi Sorrentino
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vladyslav Manafov
Player
Bogdan Ionut Apostol
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Konstantin Kravchuk
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
11
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Sabanin
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
18
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olivier Rojas
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Vito Tonejc
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
77%
(
78 of
101)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
86%
(
61 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Vladislav Ivanov
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Niccolo Catini
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve %
95%
(
20 of
21)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
35
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonio Massara
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Berk Ilkel
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (340/231) | Win/Loss | 56% (335/268) |
| 58% (746/546) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (749/633) |
| 54% (6512/5583) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6682/6152) |
| 61% (166/106) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (173/159) |
| 59% (133/92) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (158/103) |
| 55% (41/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 2090 | Aces Total | 637 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1396 | Total Double Faults | 762 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:35 |
| 601.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.37 |
| 60% (14603/24338) | 1st Serve % | 72% (20121/27826) |
| 73% (10695/14603) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12663/20121) |
| 53% (5149/9735) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3893/7705) |
| 42% (979/2306) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1325/3030) |
| 39% (9378/24275) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11584/27853) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (25/41) | Challenger W/L | 37% (10/17) |
| 63% (314/188) | Futures W/L | 56% (325/251) |
| 60% (334/561) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (327/594) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (91/177) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (78/155) |
| 55% (83/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (98/186) |
| 89% (340/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (332/283) |
| 11% (340/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (332/49) |
| 16% (231/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (271/50) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
